Revue semestrielle de linguistique et littératures romanes

Écho des études romanes 2013, 9(1):35-49 | DOI: 10.32725/eer.2013.003

L’humour comme altérité communicationnelle: de la définition à la typologieFrench

El¿bieta BIARDZKA, Ewa PARTYKA
Université de Wroc³aw

Mots clés: humour communicationnel ; altérité communicationnelle ; entropie ; modèle du code ; modèle inférentiel

Humor as communicative otherness: from definition to typology

The subject of this work is the verbal humor perceived as a peculiar, unexpected (entropic) aberration from communicational rules. Those rules are derived from the complex, «systemic» communicational model (Jakobson) modified by adding inferential models (Grice, Kerbrat-Orecchioni). The typology of humors covered in this work includes emotive humor, conative humor, poetic humor, phatic humor etc.; but also intentional (pragmatic) humor (based on the violation of the cooperative principle).

Keywords: communicational humor; pragmatic humor; entropy; aberration from communicational rules

Published: June 11, 2013  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
BIARDZKA, E., & PARTYKA, E. (2013). L’humour comme altérité communicationnelle: de la définition à la typologie. Écho des études romanes, 9(1), 35-49. doi: 10.32725/eer.2013.003
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. ATTARDO Salvatore (1994), Linguistic Theories of Humor, Berlin, Mouton de Gruyter.
    2. AUSTIN John (1962), How to Do Things with Words, London, Oxford University Press.
    3. BAYLОN Christian; MIGNОT Xavier (1991), Communication, Paris, Nathan.
    4. BERGSON Henri (1900), Le rire, Paris, Alcan.
    5. BÜHLER Karl (1934), Sprachtheorie : Die Darstellungsfunktion der Sprache. Jena, Fischer.
    6. CHABANNE Jean-Charles (1999), Verbal, paraverbal et non-verbal dans l'interaction verbale humoristique, in : J.-M. Dufays, L. Rosier (dir.), Approche du discours comique, actes de la journée d'étude Adiscom-Cothum, dir. J.-M. Dufays et L. Rosier, coll. >, Bruxelles, Mardaga, p. 35-53.
    7. CHARAUDEAU Patrick (2011), Des catégories pour l'humour. Précisions, rectifications, compléments >>, in : M. D. Vivero Garcia (éd.) Humour et crise sociale, Paris, L'Harmattan, p. 9-43.
    8. DUCROT Oswald (1979), Les lois de discours, Langue Française 42, Paris, Larousse, p. 21-33. Go to original source...
    9. FIЅKE John (2003), Wprowadzenie do badañ nad komunikowaniem, Wroc³aw, Astrum.
    10. GOFFMAN Erving (1977), Cz³owiek w teatrze ¿ycia codziennego, traduit par H. Datner-¦piewak, P. ¦piewak, (The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life, 1959), Warszawa, PIW.
    11. GRICE H. Paul (1975), Logic and Conversation, in : P. Cole, J. L. Morgan (éds), Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 3, Speech Acts, New York, Academic Press.
    12. JAKOBSON Roman (1963), Linguistique et théorie de la communication, in : Essais de linguistique générale, traduit de l'anglais par N. Ruwet, Paris, Minuit.
    13. KERBRAT-ORECCHIONI Catherine (1980), L'énonciation. De la subjectivité dans le langage, Paris, Armand Colin.
    14. KERBRAT-ORECCHIONI Catherine (1996), La conversation, Paris, Seuil.
    15. LAKOFF Robin (1973), The logic of politeness, or minding your p's and q's, Papers from the ninth regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, p. 292-305.
    16. LAROUSSE.
    17. MORIER Henri (1998) [1961], Dictionnaire de poétique et de rhétorique. Paris, Presses universitaires de France.
    18. NORRICK N. R.; Chiaro D. (éds) (2009), Humor in Interaction. Amsterdam, John Benjamins Publishing Company. Go to original source...
    19. NORRICK N. R.; Bubel C. (2009), Direct address as a resource for humor, [dans] N. R. Norrick; D. Chiaro (éds.) Humor in Interaction, Amsterdam, John Benjamins Publishing Company, p.29-47. Go to original source...
    20. RABATEL Alain (2012), Ironie et sur-énonciation, Vox romanica 71, (sous presse).
    21. RABATEL Alain (2013), Humour et sous-énonciation (vs ironie et sur-énonciation), L'Information grammaticale 136, (en lecture). Go to original source...
    22. SEARLE John R. (1969), Speech Acts: An Essay in The Philosophy of Language, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. Go to original source...
    23. SHANNON Claude Elwood; WEAVER Claude Elwood (1963), The Mathematical Theory of Communication, University of Illinois Press.
    24. SPERBER Dan; WILSON Deirdre (1989), La pertinence. Communication et cognition, Paris, Editions de Minuit.
    25. VANDAELE Jeroen (2002), Humor Mechanisms in Film Comedy: Incongruity and Superiority, Poetics Today 23:2, p. 221-249. Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content